Kishor Ganpatrao Adkine 01 vs Sanjay Ganpatrao Adkine Advocate - Gurnule V. T — 38/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th May 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHWR010006202018
Filing Number
269/2018
Filing Date
04-04-2018
Registration No
38/2018
Registration Date
07-04-2018
Court
District and Session Court , Wardha
Judge
2-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kishor Ganpatrao Adkine 01
Adv. Khare A. R..
Prashil Kishor Adkine
Adv. Khare A. R..
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Ganpatrao Adkine Advocate - Gurnule V. T
Hearing History
Judge: 2-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA
Disposed
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-05-2026 | Citation |
| 29-04-2026 | Citation |
| 16-04-2026 | Citation |
| 13-04-2026 | Citation |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Court of Wardha set aside the trial court's judgment and declared two wills (dated 1982 and 2009) null and void, finding they were not validly executed or attested as required by law. The court held that the attesting witnesses failed to prove due execution, the beneficiary took active part in the wills' creation (a suspicious circumstance), and consequently all parties are co-owners of the disputed house property with equal 1/6th shares each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Court of Wardha set aside the trial court's judgment and declared two wills (dated 1982 and 2009) null and void, finding they were not validly executed or attested as required by law. The court held that the attesting witnesses failed to prove due execution, the beneficiary took active part in the wills' creation (a suspicious circumstance), and consequently all parties are co-owners of the disputed house property with equal 1/6th shares each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts