Mohan Kawduji Kathane vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station, Ramnagar Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 83/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 11th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHWR010004372026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

180/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

83/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Wardha

Judge

4-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE WARDHA

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

148

Police Station

Police Station Ramnagar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 75
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

Mohan Kawduji Kathane

Adv. KHANDEKAR PRIYANKA BHIMRAO

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station, Ramnagar Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 4-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE WARDHA

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Order

07-03-2026

Reply/Say

04-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the bail application of Mohan s/o Kawduji Kathane, accused of outraging modesty under Section 75 of BNS, 2023 and Section 12 of POCSO Act. The court found that substantial investigation was completed, the accused had no criminal background, and continued custody was unwarranted, though it imposed conditions including weekly police station attendance and a ban on witness intimidation. Bail was granted on furnishing personal recognizance and surety of Rs. 25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the bail application of Mohan s/o Kawduji Kathane, accused of outraging modesty under Section 75 of BNS, 2023 and Section 12 of POCSO Act. The court found that substantial investigation was completed, the accused had no criminal background, and continued custody was unwarranted, though it imposed conditions including weekly police station attendance and a ban on witness intimidation. Bail was granted on furnishing personal recognizance and surety of Rs. 25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Wardha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case