Mohammad Moinuddin Salauddin Khan vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station, Wardha City Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 82/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHWR010004362026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
179/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
82/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Wardha
Judge
4-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE WARDHA
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
76
Police Station
Police Station Wardha
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohammad Moinuddin Salauddin Khan
Adv. Deshpande A. D.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station, Wardha City Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 4-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE WARDHA
Disposed
Order
Order
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order |
| 12-03-2026 | Order |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the bail application of Mohammad Moinuddin, accused in a POCSO Act case involving allegations of abduction and sexual assault of a 17-year-old girl. The court found that while investigation was substantially complete, the victim's contradictory statements, lack of medical/biological evidence, the victim's long-standing acquaintance with the accused, and the victim's own no-objection to bail warranted his release. The accused was granted regular bail of Rs. 25,000 with conditions including weekly police reporting and no contact with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the bail application of Mohammad Moinuddin, accused in a POCSO Act case involving allegations of abduction and sexual assault of a 17-year-old girl. The court found that while investigation was substantially complete, the victim's contradictory statements, lack of medical/biological evidence, the victim's long-standing acquaintance with the accused, and the victim's own no-objection to bail warranted his release. The accused was granted regular bail of Rs. 25,000 with conditions including weekly police reporting and no contact with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts