Sagar Ashokrao Deshmukh vs State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Arvi Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 71/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHWR010003432026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
152/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
71/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Wardha
Judge
2-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
3
Police Station
Police Station Arvi
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sagar Ashokrao Deshmukh
Adv. Nawale P. V.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Arvi Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 2-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA
Disposed
Order
Order
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Order |
| 07-03-2026 | Order |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 04-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, rejected the anticipatory bail application of Sagar Ashokrao Deshmukh, a Union Manager accused of misappropriating ₹1,56,405 collected from 12 loan members between July-October 2024 that he failed to deposit with Bharat Financial Inclusion Ltd. The court found prima facie evidence of involvement through member statements and held that custodial interrogation was necessary for effective investigation into the financial misappropriation and breach of trust, viewing such offences as serious as they undermine institutional integrity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, rejected the anticipatory bail application of Sagar Ashokrao Deshmukh, a Union Manager accused of misappropriating ₹1,56,405 collected from 12 loan members between July-October 2024 that he failed to deposit with Bharat Financial Inclusion Ltd. The court found prima facie evidence of involvement through member statements and held that custodial interrogation was necessary for effective investigation into the financial misappropriation and breach of trust, viewing such offences as serious as they undermine institutional integrity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts