Harshal Rajendra Raut vs State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Ashti Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 46/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 11th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHWR010002282026
e-Filing Number
02-02-2026
Filing Number
111/2026
Filing Date
02-02-2026
Registration No
46/2026
Registration Date
02-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Wardha
Judge
2-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
18
Police Station
Police Station Ashti
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Harshal Rajendra Raut
Adv. Umate P.V.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Ashti Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 2-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 05-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha granted anticipatory bail to Harshal Rajendra Raut in a case involving assault charges arising from a quarrel at a hotel. The court found it to be a mutual inter-se conflict where both parties lodged competing FIRs against each other, and noted that substantial investigation was already completed, the weapon seized, and co-accused released on bail. The applicant was released on bail of ₹25,000 with conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-interference with witnesses, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha granted anticipatory bail to Harshal Rajendra Raut in a case involving assault charges arising from a quarrel at a hotel. The court found it to be a mutual inter-se conflict where both parties lodged competing FIRs against each other, and noted that substantial investigation was already completed, the weapon seized, and co-accused released on bail. The applicant was released on bail of ₹25,000 with conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-interference with witnesses, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts