State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Talegoan S.P. vs Devendra alias Deva Omkar Kakde 05 Advocate - Rathi Roshan R. — 5/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(i),64(2)(m),65(1),70(2),351(2). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHWR010001302026
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
69/2026
Filing Date
15-01-2026
Registration No
5/2026
Registration Date
16-01-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Wardha
Judge
4-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE WARDHA
FIR Details
FIR Number
609
Police Station
Talegaon S.P.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Talegoan S.P.
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Devendra alias Deva Omkar Kakde 05 Advocate - Rathi Roshan R.
Aniket Gajanan Shendre
Akash Mahadeorao Irpache
Shashank Dnyaneshwar Manohare
Vijay Madanrao Pachekar
Gaurav Omkar Kakde
Hearing History
Judge: 4-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE WARDHA
Charge
Charge
Charge
Appearance
Filing of Surety
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Charge |
| 13-04-2026 | Charge |
| 30-03-2026 | Charge |
| 24-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 23-03-2026 | Filing of Surety |
Interim Orders
BAIL GRANTED The court allowed the bail application of three accused (Aniket Gajanan Shendre, Shashank Dnyaneshwar Manohare, and Devendra Onkar Kakde) charged with gang rape and POCSO Act violations. The judge cited critical evidentiary weaknesses: a 5-month delay in filing the FIR, negative DNA analysis excluding biological paternity, and inconsistencies in how accused names appeared in the FIR. The accused were released on regular bail of Rs. 25,000 each with conditions including non-contact with the victim, no witness intimidation, and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL GRANTED The court allowed the bail application of three accused (Aniket Gajanan Shendre, Shashank Dnyaneshwar Manohare, and Devendra Onkar Kakde) charged with gang rape and POCSO Act violations. The judge cited critical evidentiary weaknesses: a 5-month delay in filing the FIR, negative DNA analysis excluding biological paternity, and inconsistencies in how accused names appeared in the FIR. The accused were released on regular bail of Rs. 25,000 each with conditions including non-contact with the victim, no witness intimidation, and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts