Ankush Rambhau Vairagade vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station, Wardha City Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 16/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHWR010000892026
e-Filing Number
12-01-2026
Filing Number
39/2026
Filing Date
12-01-2026
Registration No
16/2026
Registration Date
12-01-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Wardha
Judge
2-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
1351
Police Station
Police Station Wardha
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ankush Rambhau Vairagade
Adv. Vaidya V.P.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station, Wardha City Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 2-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 02-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, granted bail to applicant Ankush S/o Rambhau Vairagade in a bank fraud case involving ₹2,55,92,000. Though the court acknowledged prima facie evidence of document forgery in loan disbursements, it held that investigation was complete, custodial interrogation no longer required, and the charge-sheet had been filed. The court ordered the applicant's release on a ₹1,00,000 personal bond with surety, noting that prolonged detention would constitute pre-trial conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, granted bail to applicant Ankush S/o Rambhau Vairagade in a bank fraud case involving ₹2,55,92,000. Though the court acknowledged prima facie evidence of document forgery in loan disbursements, it held that investigation was complete, custodial interrogation no longer required, and the charge-sheet had been filed. The court ordered the applicant's release on a ₹1,00,000 personal bond with surety, noting that prolonged detention would constitute pre-trial conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts