Ankush Rambhau Vairagade vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station, Wardha City Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 16/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHWR010000892026

e-Filing Number

12-01-2026

Filing Number

39/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

16/2026

Registration Date

12-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Wardha

Judge

2-District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1351

Police Station

Police Station Wardha

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Indian Penal Code Section 406,408,419,420,467,468,471,472,474,475,120(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ankush Rambhau Vairagade

    Adv. Vaidya V.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station, Wardha City Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, granted bail to applicant Ankush S/o Rambhau Vairagade in a bank fraud case involving ₹2,55,92,000. Though the court acknowledged prima facie evidence of document forgery in loan disbursements, it held that investigation was complete, custodial interrogation no longer required, and the charge-sheet had been filed. The court ordered the applicant's release on a ₹1,00,000 personal bond with surety, noting that prolonged detention would constitute pre-trial conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  9. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  12. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  13. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  14. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  15. 07-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  16. 05-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  17. 03-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  18. 31-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  19. 29-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  20. 27-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  21. 22-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  22. 14-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  23. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, granted bail to applicant Ankush S/o Rambhau Vairagade in a bank fraud case involving ₹2,55,92,000. Though the court acknowledged prima facie evidence of document forgery in loan disbursements, it held that investigation was complete, custodial interrogation no longer required, and the charge-sheet had been filed. The court ordered the applicant's release on a ₹1,00,000 personal bond with surety, noting that prolonged detention would constitute pre-trial conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case