Shashikant Dashrath Mandhare 01 vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station, Wardha City Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 10/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHWR010000722026

e-Filing Number

08-01-2026

Filing Number

29/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

10/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Wardha

Judge

2-District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1351

Police Station

Police Station Wardha

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439
Indian Penal Code Section 406,408,420,467,468,471

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shashikant Dashrath Mandhare 01

    Adv. Rathi Roshan R.

  2. 2.Pradip alias Jitu Vinod Bhandekar

    Adv. Rathi Roshan R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station, Wardha City Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, granted bail to two applicants accused of defrauding Axis Bank of Rs. 2,55,92,000 by preparing forged documents and facilitating fraudulent loan disbursals. The court found prima facie evidence of their involvement in creating bogus customers and false salary slips, but held that the charge-sheet completion, documentary evidence preservation, and prolonged custody (since September 2025) rendered further detention unjustified. The applicants were released on personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each with strict conditions against witness tampering and jurisdictional restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  10. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  11. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  13. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  14. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  15. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  16. 07-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  17. 05-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  18. 03-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  19. 31-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  20. 29-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  21. 27-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  22. 22-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  23. 14-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  24. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, granted bail to two applicants accused of defrauding Axis Bank of Rs. 2,55,92,000 by preparing forged documents and facilitating fraudulent loan disbursals. The court found prima facie evidence of their involvement in creating bogus customers and false salary slips, but held that the charge-sheet completion, documentary evidence preservation, and prolonged custody (since September 2025) rendered further detention unjustified. The applicants were released on personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each with strict conditions against witness tampering and jurisdictional restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case