Shuddhodhan Mukinda Mate vs State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Sewagram Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 5/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHWR010000552026
e-Filing Number
06-01-2026
Filing Number
24/2026
Filing Date
06-01-2026
Registration No
5/2026
Registration Date
07-01-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Wardha
Judge
2-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
767
Police Station
Police Station Sewagram
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shuddhodhan Mukinda Mate
Adv. Khobragade A.N.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Sewagram Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 2-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 02-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 18-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 10-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the applicant's petition and ordered release of his seized Suzuki Access 125 moped upon execution of an ₹80,000 bond, finding no evidence the vehicle was used for drug trafficking despite the applicant's involvement in an NDPS case. The court reasoned that prolonged police custody would cause deterioration and serve no purpose after investigation completion, relying on Supreme Court precedent that seized vehicles should be released with appropriate bonds rather than kept indefinitely at police stations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the applicant's petition and ordered release of his seized Suzuki Access 125 moped upon execution of an ₹80,000 bond, finding no evidence the vehicle was used for drug trafficking despite the applicant's involvement in an NDPS case. The court reasoned that prolonged police custody would cause deterioration and serve no purpose after investigation completion, relying on Supreme Court precedent that seized vehicles should be released with appropriate bonds rather than kept indefinitely at police stations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts