Shuddhodhan Mukinda Mate vs State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Sewagram Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 5/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application

CNR: MHWR010000552026

e-Filing Number

06-01-2026

Filing Number

24/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

5/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Wardha

Judge

2-District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

767

Police Station

Police Station Sewagram

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503
Motor Vehicles Act Section 177,130
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c),20,20(b),(ii)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shuddhodhan Mukinda Mate

    Adv. Khobragade A.N.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Sewagram Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed the applicant's petition and ordered release of his seized Suzuki Access 125 moped upon execution of an ₹80,000 bond, finding no evidence the vehicle was used for drug trafficking despite the applicant's involvement in an NDPS case. The court reasoned that prolonged police custody would cause deterioration and serve no purpose after investigation completion, relying on Supreme Court precedent that seized vehicles should be released with appropriate bonds rather than kept indefinitely at police stations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  10. 21-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  11. 16-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  12. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the applicant's petition and ordered release of his seized Suzuki Access 125 moped upon execution of an ₹80,000 bond, finding no evidence the vehicle was used for drug trafficking despite the applicant's involvement in an NDPS case. The court reasoned that prolonged police custody would cause deterioration and serve no purpose after investigation completion, relying on Supreme Court precedent that seized vehicles should be released with appropriate bonds rather than kept indefinitely at police stations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case