Shuddhodhan Mukinda Mate vs State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Sewagram Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 5/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.

Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application

CNR: MHWR010000552026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-01-2026

Filing Number

24/2026

Filing Date

06-01-2026

Registration No

5/2026

Registration Date

07-01-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Wardha

Judge

2-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

767

Police Station

Police Station Sewagram

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 177,130
NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT Section 8(c),20,20(b),(ii)

Petitioner(s)

Shuddhodhan Mukinda Mate

Adv. Khobragade A.N.

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Sewagram Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 2-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA

16-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Hearing

02-03-2026

Hearing

18-02-2026

Hearing

10-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the applicant's petition and ordered release of his seized Suzuki Access 125 moped upon execution of an ₹80,000 bond, finding no evidence the vehicle was used for drug trafficking despite the applicant's involvement in an NDPS case. The court reasoned that prolonged police custody would cause deterioration and serve no purpose after investigation completion, relying on Supreme Court precedent that seized vehicles should be released with appropriate bonds rather than kept indefinitely at police stations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the applicant's petition and ordered release of his seized Suzuki Access 125 moped upon execution of an ₹80,000 bond, finding no evidence the vehicle was used for drug trafficking despite the applicant's involvement in an NDPS case. The court reasoned that prolonged police custody would cause deterioration and serve no purpose after investigation completion, relying on Supreme Court precedent that seized vehicles should be released with appropriate bonds rather than kept indefinitely at police stations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Wardha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case