Ravindra Madhaorao Dhanorkar vs Nalini Ravindra Dhanorkar Advocate - Panel Adv. Jawalekar S.S. — 5/2026

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

M.J.Cases - Misc. Judicial Cases

CNR: MHWR010000542026

e-Filing Number

06-01-2026

Filing Number

31/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

5/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Wardha

Judge

3-District Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ravindra Madhaorao Dhanorkar

    Adv. TIBDEWAL BELA VINODKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nalini Ravindra Dhanorkar Advocate - Panel Adv. Jawalekar S.S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The District Court of Wardha rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against an interim maintenance order under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found that the applicant failed to provide sufficient cause for the 144-day delay, rejecting claims of brain damage and financial hardship as the applicant had demonstrated good health in subsequent legal proceedings and affidavits. The court held that no credible evidence supported the alleged impediments to timely appeal filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  4. 06-May-2026

    Order

    District Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Order

    District Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  6. 22-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Wardha

  11. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Court of Wardha rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against an interim maintenance order under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found that the applicant failed to provide sufficient cause for the 144-day delay, rejecting claims of brain damage and financial hardship as the applicant had demonstrated good health in subsequent legal proceedings and affidavits. The court held that no credible evidence supported the alleged impediments to timely appeal filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case