Dinesh Alias Tukaram Shymarao Ghodmare vs State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Sindi Advocate - Takwale G. V. — 1/2020
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 20th May 2026.
Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal
CNR: MHWR010000492020
Filing Number
32/2020
Filing Date
08-01-2020
Registration No
1/2020
Registration Date
09-01-2020
Court
District and Session Court , Wardha
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE WARDHA
Decision Date
20th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dinesh Alias Tukaram Shymarao Ghodmare
Adv. Chandak H. K.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Sindi Advocate - Takwale G. V.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE WARDHA
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court partly allowed the appeal, acquitting the appellant of wrongful restraint (Section 341) and criminal intimidation (Section 506(II)) charges due to insufficient evidence, but upheld his conviction for obscene language in public (Section 294). The court found the prosecution failed to prove actual obstruction preventing movement and lacked evidence of intent to cause alarm through threats, but confirmed obscene abuses against the victim on a public road caused annoyance. The sentence for Section 294 was modified from three months rigorous imprisonment and ₹1,000 fine to simple imprisonment till court rising and ₹2,500 fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The court partly allowed the appeal, acquitting the appellant of wrongful restraint (Section 341) and criminal intimidation (Section 506(II)) charges due to insufficient evidence, but upheld his conviction for obscene language in public (Section 294). The court found the prosecution failed to prove actual obstruction preventing movement and lacked evidence of intent to cause alarm through threats, but confirmed obscene abuses against the victim on a public road caused annoyance. The sentence for Section 294 was modified from three months rigorous imprisonment and ₹1,000 fine to simple imprisonment till court rising and ₹2,500 fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts