Mahadev Khushaba Khapre vs Kachru Bhau Saple — 121/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420, 467, 471, 120(b), 504, 506 and 34. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHTH200016552025
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
10-10-2025
Filing Number
1523/2025
Filing Date
13-10-2025
Registration No
121/2025
Registration Date
15-10-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Divison , Shahapur
Judge
3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C, Shahpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahadev Khushaba Khapre
Adv. SHINDE ULHAS SHRIDHAR
Vilas Bhudhaji Dinkar
Adv. SHINDE ULHAS SHRIDHAR
Respondent(s)
Kachru Bhau Saple
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C, Shahpur
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
First Order
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 10-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-03-2026 | First Order |
| 16-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 23-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case 121/2025 Summary: The court rejected the complainants' request for direct FIR registration against Kachru Bhau Saple for alleged forgery, signature fraud, and misappropriation in an educational trust dispute. Instead, the court took cognizance of the private complaint and scheduled the matter for recording the complainants' verification statements under Section 223 BNSS on 20/06/2026, finding insufficient evidence to establish Saple's personal involvement in the alleged forgery and noting the matter involves internal trust administrative conflict linked to ongoing Charity Commissioner proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 121/2025 Summary: The court rejected the complainants' request for direct FIR registration against Kachru Bhau Saple for alleged forgery, signature fraud, and misappropriation in an educational trust dispute. Instead, the court took cognizance of the private complaint and scheduled the matter for recording the complainants' verification statements under Section 223 BNSS on 20/06/2026, finding insufficient evidence to establish Saple's personal involvement in the alleged forgery and noting the matter involves internal trust administrative conflict linked to ongoing Charity Commissioner proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts