Kamlabai Gopal Bangar and 3 vs Tatu Devu Bangar and — 56/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHTH200011782023
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
94/2023
Filing Date
01-07-2023
Registration No
56/2023
Registration Date
05-07-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Divison , Shahapur
Judge
3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C, Shahpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kamlabai Gopal Bangar and 3
Adv. Bhere Sandhya Madhukar
Deepak Gopal Bangar
Hari Gopal Bangar
Namdev Gopal Bangar
Respondent(s)
Tatu Devu Bangar and
Kashinath Devu Bangar
Vitthal Devu Bangar
Surekha Barku Bangar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C, Shahpur
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 25-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 07-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 17-12-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 56/2023 Outcome: The court partially allowed the petitioner's application. The court imposed a cost of ₹1,000 on the petitioner (plaintiff) for approximately five months of delay in complying with previous court orders regarding property partition. However, the court permitted the petitioner to complete the necessary compliance with the earlier order (Notice 18) and did not dismiss the main case as the respondents had requested. The petitioner was directed to immediately comply with the procedural requirements and pay the court fees as ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 56/2023 Outcome: The court partially allowed the petitioner's application. The court imposed a cost of ₹1,000 on the petitioner (plaintiff) for approximately five months of delay in complying with previous court orders regarding property partition. However, the court permitted the petitioner to complete the necessary compliance with the earlier order (Notice 18) and did not dismiss the main case as the respondents had requested. The petitioner was directed to immediately comply with the procedural requirements and pay the court fees as ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts