Bhaskar Raghunath Nichite and 3 vs Krushna Govind Nichite and — 74/2017
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHTH200010572017
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
81/2017
Filing Date
30-10-2017
Registration No
74/2017
Registration Date
30-10-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Divison , Shahapur
Judge
3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C, Shahpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhaskar Raghunath Nichite and 3
Adv. Deepak Kondiram Botkondle
Dashrath Raghunath Nichite
Laxman Raghunath Nichite
Chandrakant Raghunath Nichite
Respondent(s)
Krushna Govind Nichite and
Lahu Raghunath Nichite
Sarjitsingh Thakarsingh Chandok
Rajendrapalsingh Surjitsingh Chandok
Vinodkumar Bharat Singh
Pramodkumar Bharat Singh
Sujitkumar Bharat Singh
Shankarprasad Sukhalal Singh
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C, Shahpur
Evidence
Evidence
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-02-2026 | Issues |
| 29-01-2026 | Issues |
| 11-12-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 74/2017 The suit for partition and declaration of rights was partially abated. The court found that Respondent No. 3 died on 05/06/2011 before the suit was filed, so the claim against him was abated. The court also dismissed the claim against Respondent No. 8 due to petitioner's lack of interest, as nearly five years passed without proper efforts to serve him after summons was issued in 2017. The case was adjourned for further hearing with an interim application by petitioners to be filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 74/2017 The suit for partition and declaration of rights was partially abated. The court found that Respondent No. 3 died on 05/06/2011 before the suit was filed, so the claim against him was abated. The court also dismissed the claim against Respondent No. 8 due to petitioner's lack of interest, as nearly five years passed without proper efforts to serve him after summons was issued in 2017. The case was adjourned for further hearing with an interim application by petitioners to be filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts