Samir Bacchubhai Shaha vs Hrushikesh Mukesh Shaha and 2 Advocate - Shirish B. Patil — 48/2017
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 31,38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHTH200006902017
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
52/2017
Filing Date
03-08-2017
Registration No
48/2017
Registration Date
03-08-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Divison , Shahapur
Judge
3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C, Shahpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Samir Bacchubhai Shaha
Adv. Mhaskar Rajesh Tukaram
Respondent(s)
Hrushikesh Mukesh Shaha and 2 Advocate - Shirish B. Patil
Kirtikumar Chandulal Shaha
Mukesh Chandulal Shaha
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C, Shahpur
Evidence
Evidence
Issues
Issues
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-02-2026 | Issues |
| 23-12-2025 | Issues |
| 25-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 48/2017 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for amendment of pleadings. The plaintiff sought to amend his perpetual injunction suit regarding a disputed road through properties in Shahapur, Thane, by adding facts about a steel frame structure erected by defendants during the suit's pendency and seeking relief for its removal. The court found the proposed amendments necessary to determine the real questions in controversy between parties, as the facts directly related to the disputed road issue. The plaintiff was directed to finalize amendments within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 48/2017 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for amendment of pleadings. The plaintiff sought to amend his perpetual injunction suit regarding a disputed road through properties in Shahapur, Thane, by adding facts about a steel frame structure erected by defendants during the suit's pendency and seeking relief for its removal. The court found the proposed amendments necessary to determine the real questions in controversy between parties, as the facts directly related to the disputed road issue. The plaintiff was directed to finalize amendments within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts