Moreshwar Ganpat Deshmukh vs Dattatraya Hanumant Deshmukh 1 Advocate - Gawali Bhimraj Kisanrao — 2000003/2005
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R11. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition
CNR: MHTH200001542005
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
2000003/2005
Filing Date
26-10-2005
Registration No
2000003/2005
Registration Date
26-10-2005
Court
Civil Court Junior Divison , Shahapur
Judge
3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C, Shahpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Moreshwar Ganpat Deshmukh
Adv. P J PUROHIT
Respondent(s)
Dattatraya Hanumant Deshmukh 1 Advocate - Gawali Bhimraj Kisanrao
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C, Shahpur
Reply/Say
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 05-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 30-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 18-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 17-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 2000003/2005 Petition Dismissed; Cost Award Imposed In this property dispute concerning encroachment removal on public road Survey No. 473, Petitioner Moreshwar Ganpat Deshmukh's application for stay of execution was dismissed. The court found that the original judgment (Civil Suit 35/1998) ordering removal of encroachment had become final after the petitioner's appeal was withdrawn. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments that procedural requirements under CPC Order 21 were unmet and that relocation of a grain mill affected the encroachment case. The court awarded cost of Rs. 1,000 against the petitioner, payable to respondent Dattatraya Hanumant Deshmukh by next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 2000003/2005 Petition Dismissed; Cost Award Imposed In this property dispute concerning encroachment removal on public road Survey No. 473, Petitioner Moreshwar Ganpat Deshmukh's application for stay of execution was dismissed. The court found that the original judgment (Civil Suit 35/1998) ordering removal of encroachment had become final after the petitioner's appeal was withdrawn. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments that procedural requirements under CPC Order 21 were unmet and that relocation of a grain mill affected the encroachment case. The court awarded cost of Rs. 1,000 against the petitioner, payable to respondent Dattatraya Hanumant Deshmukh by next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts