AVDHESHKUMAR MATAPRASAD MORYA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (BOISAR POLICE STATION) — 368/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 18th March 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHTH170060372025
e-Filing Number
24-12-2025
Filing Number
5632/2025
Filing Date
26-12-2025
Registration No
368/2025
Registration Date
26-12-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar
Judge
6-II JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J. D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AVDHESHKUMAR MATAPRASAD MORYA
Adv. Amita sitaram Lade
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (BOISAR POLICE STATION)
Hearing History
Judge: 6-II JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J. D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 11-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 09-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: O.M.A. 368/2025 – Avdheshkumar Mataprasad Morya v. State of Maharashtra The court allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 BNSS for temporary release of a seized TVS Jupiter 125 motorcycle (valued at Rs. 80,000), finding the applicant is the registered owner prima facie entitled to possession. The court accepted arguments that unused storage would cause decay and ordered release upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,60,000, subject to strict conditions including maintaining valid insurance, not selling or altering the vehicle, and producing it on court demand until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.M.A. 368/2025 – Avdheshkumar Mataprasad Morya v. State of Maharashtra The court allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 BNSS for temporary release of a seized TVS Jupiter 125 motorcycle (valued at Rs. 80,000), finding the applicant is the registered owner prima facie entitled to possession. The court accepted arguments that unused storage would cause decay and ordered release upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,60,000, subject to strict conditions including maintaining valid insurance, not selling or altering the vehicle, and producing it on court demand until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts