PARAG ASHOK KOLEKAR AND OTHER 1 vs GAURANG ANANT PATIL — 51/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHTH170017292025
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
e-Filing Number
27-03-2025
Filing Number
125/2025
Filing Date
19-04-2025
Registration No
51/2025
Registration Date
19-04-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar
Judge
2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARAG ASHOK KOLEKAR AND OTHER 1
Adv. THAKUR VARSHA JAYESH
ASHOK A JETHVA
Adv. THAKUR VARSHA JAYESH
Respondent(s)
GAURANG ANANT PATIL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Issues
Order on Exh
Amended Plaint
Order on Exh
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Issues |
| 29-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 22-04-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 09-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 24-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 51/2025 Outcome: The court partly allowed the temporary injunction application. The defendant Gaurang Patil is restrained from disturbing the plaintiffs' possession of the suit property (0.24.50R in Girale, Palghar) or creating any third-party interest in it until final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima-facie case through a registered sale deed dated 02/05/2017, balance of convenience favored them, and they would suffer irreparable loss without the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 51/2025 Outcome: The court partly allowed the temporary injunction application. The defendant Gaurang Patil is restrained from disturbing the plaintiffs' possession of the suit property (0.24.50R in Girale, Palghar) or creating any third-party interest in it until final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima-facie case through a registered sale deed dated 02/05/2017, balance of convenience favored them, and they would suffer irreparable loss without the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts