Vashishtaprasad Ramagya Gupta vs Nilesh Churi and Others Advocate - A.P.Adhikari — 93/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,39. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHTH170015942021
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
Filing Number
158/2021
Filing Date
20-07-2021
Registration No
93/2021
Registration Date
20-07-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar
Judge
11-Civil Judge S D Palghar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vashishtaprasad Ramagya Gupta
Adv. S D Shukla
Respondent(s)
Nilesh Churi and Others Advocate - A.P.Adhikari
Shila Save
Hearing History
Judge: 11-Civil Judge S D Palghar
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 13-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 21-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 30-01-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 07-01-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case 93/2021 Summary: The court allowed defendants' application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, condoning delays of 1148 and 422 days respectively in filing written statements. The court found the defendants' reasons—including obtaining certified copies from prior proceedings, their advocate's death in April 2025, and subsequent engagement of new counsel—constituted sufficient cause and were not deliberately intentional. The application was granted in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 93/2021 Summary: The court allowed defendants' application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, condoning delays of 1148 and 422 days respectively in filing written statements. The court found the defendants' reasons—including obtaining certified copies from prior proceedings, their advocate's death in April 2025, and subsequent engagement of new counsel—constituted sufficient cause and were not deliberately intentional. The application was granted in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts