State of Maharashtra vs Sadhna Sandeep Panthale Advocate - APP — 708/2021
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65,E,98. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHTH170015232021
Filing Number
1372/2021
Filing Date
11-06-2021
Registration No
708/2021
Registration Date
11-06-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar
Judge
2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
18
Police Station
Palghar Excise Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sadhna Sandeep Panthale Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 31-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 04-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 23-05-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 708/2021 Summary The Palghar Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act after the case remained pending for years with the accused continuously absent and the prosecution unable to secure witness testimony or a Competent Authority report. The court found no reasonable prospect of conviction and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC, ordering seized items sold as scrap with proceeds deposited in government treasury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 708/2021 Summary The Palghar Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act after the case remained pending for years with the accused continuously absent and the prosecution unable to secure witness testimony or a Competent Authority report. The court found no reasonable prospect of conviction and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC, ordering seized items sold as scrap with proceeds deposited in government treasury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts