State of Maharashtra vs Shankar Rayamalu Munjya Advocate - S C PIMPALE — 706/2021

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65,(E)66(K),(D)98. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHTH170015212021

Case disposed

Filing Number

1370/2021

Filing Date

11-06-2021

Registration No

706/2021

Registration Date

11-06-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar

Judge

2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

16

Police Station

Palghar Excise Police Station

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65,(E)66(K),(D)98

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Shankar Rayamalu Munjya Advocate - S C PIMPALE

Hearing History

Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR

13-03-2026

Disposed

09-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

31-10-2025

Awaiting Summons

04-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

23-05-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case 706/2021 Summary The Palghar Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (Sections 65(e), 66(k)(d), 98) and stopped proceedings under CrPC Section 258 due to the accused's prolonged absence, lack of witness cooperation, missing Charge-sheet, and minimal prosecution prospects. Seized plastic items were ordered sold as scrap with proceeds deposited in government treasury, the bail bond was cancelled, and the worthless muddemal property ordered destroyed post-appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 706/2021 Summary The Palghar Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (Sections 65(e), 66(k)(d), 98) and stopped proceedings under CrPC Section 258 due to the accused's prolonged absence, lack of witness cooperation, missing Charge-sheet, and minimal prosecution prospects. Seized plastic items were ordered sold as scrap with proceeds deposited in government treasury, the bail bond was cancelled, and the worthless muddemal property ordered destroyed post-appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case