State of Maharashtra vs Vijay Pandurang Patil Advocate - K P Bhoir — 595/2021
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e, 98. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHTH170011202021
Filing Number
995/2021
Filing Date
19-05-2021
Registration No
595/2021
Registration Date
19-05-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar
Judge
2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vijay Pandurang Patil Advocate - K P Bhoir
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 31-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 04-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 23-05-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 595/2021 Summary: The Palghar Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act due to prolonged case pendency and lack of prosecution progress. The court found the accused had been absent for an extended period, witnesses were unavailable, and there was minimal likelihood of conviction, warranting closure under Section 258 CrPC rather than further delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 595/2021 Summary: The Palghar Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act due to prolonged case pendency and lack of prosecution progress. The court found the accused had been absent for an extended period, witnesses were unavailable, and there was minimal likelihood of conviction, warranting closure under Section 258 CrPC rather than further delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts