State of Maharashtra vs Sunita Yashvant Alan Advocate - S C PIMPALE — 536/2021

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 12,65,E,90. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHTH170011022021

Case disposed

Filing Number

977/2021

Filing Date

22-04-2021

Registration No

536/2021

Registration Date

22-04-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar

Judge

2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

101

Police Station

Palghar Excise Police Station

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 12,65,E,90

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Sunita Yashvant Alan Advocate - S C PIMPALE

Hearing History

Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR

13-03-2026

Disposed

09-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

17-10-2025

Awaiting Summons

03-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

23-05-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case 536/2021 Summary The Palghar Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused of Maharashtra Prohibition Act offences under Sections 12, 65(e), and 90, finding minimal prosecution prospects after the accused remained absent and witnesses could not be secured despite repeated summons. The proceedings were halted under CrPC Section 258, the accused's bail bond was cancelled, and seized property was ordered sold as scrap with proceeds deposited to government treasury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 536/2021 Summary The Palghar Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused of Maharashtra Prohibition Act offences under Sections 12, 65(e), and 90, finding minimal prosecution prospects after the accused remained absent and witnesses could not be secured despite repeated summons. The proceedings were halted under CrPC Section 258, the accused's bail bond was cancelled, and seized property was ordered sold as scrap with proceeds deposited to government treasury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case