State of Maharashtra vs Sadhna Ramakant Raut Advocate - Aasha Marvadi — 533/2021
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 112,65,E,90. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHTH170010972021
Filing Number
972/2021
Filing Date
22-04-2021
Registration No
533/2021
Registration Date
22-04-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar
Judge
2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
95
Police Station
Palghar Excise Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sadhna Ramakant Raut Advocate - Aasha Marvadi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 17-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 03-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 23-05-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
In SCC 533/2021, the Palghar Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused Sadhna Ramakant Raut Advocate under sections 12, 65(e), and 90 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, stopping proceedings under CrPC Section 258. The court found no realistic prospect of prosecution success due to the accused's prolonged absence and failure to secure witness testimony despite repeated summons. Seized items were ordered sold as scrap with proceeds deposited to government treasury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In SCC 533/2021, the Palghar Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused Sadhna Ramakant Raut Advocate under sections 12, 65(e), and 90 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, stopping proceedings under CrPC Section 258. The court found no realistic prospect of prosecution success due to the accused's prolonged absence and failure to secure witness testimony despite repeated summons. Seized items were ordered sold as scrap with proceeds deposited to government treasury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts