Shraddha Realtors Partnership Pedhi By Avinash Kumar Kamleshwar Srivastava and other 1 vs Dhanraj Singh Hanuman Singh Rajput Hazari and other 6 — 35/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,38. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHTH170010832026
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
77/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
35/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar
Judge
2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shraddha Realtors Partnership Pedhi By Avinash Kumar Kamleshwar Srivastava and other 1
Adv. somanath kale
Chetna Raichand Shaha
Adv. somanath kale
Respondent(s)
Dhanraj Singh Hanuman Singh Rajput Hazari and other 6
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 07-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 05-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 30-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 22-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary (35/2026): The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favor of Shraddha Realtors Partnership Firm against the defendants. The defendants are restrained from obstructing construction and disturbing the plaintiff's peaceful possession of a property in Palghar. The court found the plaintiff to be the bonafide owner based on registered sale deeds and revenue records. A show-cause notice has been issued to the defendants returnable on 13.03.2026 to explain why the injunction should not be confirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary (35/2026): The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favor of Shraddha Realtors Partnership Firm against the defendants. The defendants are restrained from obstructing construction and disturbing the plaintiff's peaceful possession of a property in Palghar. The court found the plaintiff to be the bonafide owner based on registered sale deeds and revenue records. A show-cause notice has been issued to the defendants returnable on 13.03.2026 to explain why the injunction should not be confirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts