State of Maharashtra vs Sangita Pandhari Aagivale — 534/2021

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 12,65E,90. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHTH170010732021

Case disposed

Filing Number

948/2021

Filing Date

22-04-2021

Registration No

534/2021

Registration Date

22-04-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar

Judge

2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 12,65E,90

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Sangita Pandhari Aagivale

Hearing History

Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR

13-03-2026

Disposed

09-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

17-10-2025

Awaiting Summons

03-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

23-05-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sangita Pandhari Aagivale (534/2021) The Palghar Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused of offences under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC, citing the accused's prolonged absence, prosecution's failure to secure presence of accused or witnesses, and minimal likelihood of conviction. Seized items were ordered sold as scrap with proceeds deposited in government treasury, and the accused's bail bond was canceled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sangita Pandhari Aagivale (534/2021) The Palghar Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused of offences under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC, citing the accused's prolonged absence, prosecution's failure to secure presence of accused or witnesses, and minimal likelihood of conviction. Seized items were ordered sold as scrap with proceeds deposited in government treasury, and the accused's bail bond was canceled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case