Yogesh Amrutbhai Patel and other 1 vs Shaktiprasad Mataprasad Shukla and others 13 Advocate - Sanjay Patil — 17/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Order on Exh Next hearing 09-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHTH170006812023

Filing Number

45/2023

Filing Date

30-Jan-2023

Registration No

17/2023

Registration Date

30-Jan-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar

Judge

2-Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Yogesh Amrutbhai Patel and other 1

    Adv. S.H. Gupta

  2. 2.Nirav Anil Patel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shaktiprasad Mataprasad Shukla and others 13 Advocate - Sanjay Patil

  2. 2.Ambikaprasad Mataprasad Shukla

  3. 3.Mayur Tulsidas Patel

  4. 4.Pradip Tulsidas Patel

  5. 5.Vijesh Lekumal Lakhyani

  6. 6.Fatehali Karimbhai Panjwani

  7. 7.Vijay Manilal Nai

  8. 8.Mahesh Manilal Nai

  9. 9.Mayank Rajesj Patel

  10. 10.Sanjit Rajani Shukla

  11. 11.Asha Suresh Nai

  12. 12.Kalpna Hemant Patel

  13. 13.Arvind Kumar Kharchu Yadav

  14. 14.Ashok Ganpat Raut

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  7. 08-Dec-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  9. 16-Oct-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  10. 04-Oct-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  11. 18-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  12. 22-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  13. 24-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  14. 20-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  15. 09-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  16. 21-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  17. 30-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  18. 19-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  19. 01-Oct-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  20. 15-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  21. 29-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  22. 07-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  23. 16-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  24. 02-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  25. 05-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  26. 06-Jun-2023

    List of Witness

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  27. 21-Mar-2023

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: Yogesh Patel v. Shaktiprasad Shukla (R.C.S. 17/2023) The application for temporary injunction filed by Yogesh Patel and Nirav Anil Patel was rejected on March 21, 2023. The court found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Key issues: plaintiffs claimed defendants obstructed their wall compound construction; defendants countered they have an approach road easement across plaintiffs' property used by 150-170 persons. The court determined plaintiffs provided insufficient documentary evidence supporting their allegations and found defendants' affidavits more credible. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  28. 21-Mar-2023

    Issues

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  29. 20-Mar-2023

    Order on Exh

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  30. 15-Mar-2023

    Order on Exh

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  31. 13-Mar-2023

    Order on Exh

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  32. 08-Mar-2023

    Order on Exh

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  33. 06-Mar-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  34. 04-Mar-2023

    Compliance

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  35. 27-Feb-2023

    Compliance

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  36. 20-Feb-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  37. 20-Feb-2023

    Compliance

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  38. 14-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  39. 08-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  40. 06-Feb-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Palghar

  41. 01-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 30-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Yogesh Patel v. Shaktiprasad Shukla (R.C.S. 17/2023) The application for temporary injunction filed by Yogesh Patel and Nirav Anil Patel was rejected on March 21, 2023. The court found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Key issues: plaintiffs claimed defendants obstructed their wall compound construction; defendants countered they have an approach road easement across plaintiffs' property used by 150-170 persons. The court determined plaintiffs provided insufficient documentary evidence supporting their allegations and found defendants' affidavits more credible. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case