Yogesh Amrutbhai Patel and other 1 vs Shaktiprasad Mataprasad Shukla and others 13 Advocate - Sanjay Patil — 17/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHTH170006812023
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
45/2023
Filing Date
30-01-2023
Registration No
17/2023
Registration Date
30-01-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar
Judge
2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yogesh Amrutbhai Patel and other 1
Adv. S.H. Gupta
Nirav Anil Patel
Respondent(s)
Shaktiprasad Mataprasad Shukla and others 13 Advocate - Sanjay Patil
Ambikaprasad Mataprasad Shukla
Mayur Tulsidas Patel
Pradip Tulsidas Patel
Vijesh Lekumal Lakhyani
Fatehali Karimbhai Panjwani
Vijay Manilal Nai
Mahesh Manilal Nai
Mayank Rajesj Patel
Sanjit Rajani Shukla
Asha Suresh Nai
Kalpna Hemant Patel
Arvind Kumar Kharchu Yadav
Ashok Ganpat Raut
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 10-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 10-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 09-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Yogesh Patel v. Shaktiprasad Shukla (R.C.S. 17/2023) The application for temporary injunction filed by Yogesh Patel and Nirav Anil Patel was rejected on March 21, 2023. The court found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Key issues: plaintiffs claimed defendants obstructed their wall compound construction; defendants countered they have an approach road easement across plaintiffs' property used by 150-170 persons. The court determined plaintiffs provided insufficient documentary evidence supporting their allegations and found defendants' affidavits more credible. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Yogesh Patel v. Shaktiprasad Shukla (R.C.S. 17/2023) The application for temporary injunction filed by Yogesh Patel and Nirav Anil Patel was rejected on March 21, 2023. The court found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Key issues: plaintiffs claimed defendants obstructed their wall compound construction; defendants countered they have an approach road easement across plaintiffs' property used by 150-170 persons. The court determined plaintiffs provided insufficient documentary evidence supporting their allegations and found defendants' affidavits more credible. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts