PARESH PANDHARINATH MORE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA INSPECTAR STATE EXCISE DAHANU — 54/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 23rd March 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHTH170006142026
e-Filing Number
31-01-2026
Filing Number
583/2026
Filing Date
02-02-2026
Registration No
54/2026
Registration Date
02-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar
Judge
6-II JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J. D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARESH PANDHARINATH MORE
Adv. SANKHE VIJAY CHINTAMAN
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA INSPECTAR STATE EXCISE DAHANU
Hearing History
Judge: 6-II JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J. D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 16-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 09-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: O.M.A. 54/2026 Decision: The court allowed Paresh Pandharinath More's application for temporary release of his seized TVS Jupiter scooter (valued at Rs. 70,000) under Section 503 BNSS, subject to strict conditions. The applicant must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,40,000 and comply with six undertakings, including maintaining valid insurance, not selling/transferring the vehicle, not using it for illegal purposes, and producing it as directed by the court until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.M.A. 54/2026 Decision: The court allowed Paresh Pandharinath More's application for temporary release of his seized TVS Jupiter scooter (valued at Rs. 70,000) under Section 503 BNSS, subject to strict conditions. The applicant must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,40,000 and comply with six undertakings, including maintaining valid insurance, not selling/transferring the vehicle, not using it for illegal purposes, and producing it as directed by the court until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts