VINOD SITARAM vs BOISAR POLICE STATION — 49/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHTH170004502026
e-Filing Number
23-01-2026
Filing Number
421/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
49/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar
Judge
6-II JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J. D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VINOD SITARAM
Adv. Amita sitaram Lade
Respondent(s)
BOISAR POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: 6-II JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J. D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 09-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 04-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: O.M.A. 49/2026 - Vinod Sitaram v. Boisar Police Station Vinod Sitaram sought release of his seized Tata Zest vehicle under Section 503 of BNSS, claiming ownership and dependency on it for personal use. However, the court rejected the application, finding that the vehicle was purchased from proceeds of theft—specifically money embezzled through stealing copper ingots while the applicant worked as a company driver. The court also noted discrepancies in the RC book registration and concerns about potential misuse, determining release would be inappropriate given the gravity of the offense and prosecution's apprehensions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.M.A. 49/2026 - Vinod Sitaram v. Boisar Police Station Vinod Sitaram sought release of his seized Tata Zest vehicle under Section 503 of BNSS, claiming ownership and dependency on it for personal use. However, the court rejected the application, finding that the vehicle was purchased from proceeds of theft—specifically money embezzled through stealing copper ingots while the applicant worked as a company driver. The court also noted discrepancies in the RC book registration and concerns about potential misuse, determining release would be inappropriate given the gravity of the offense and prosecution's apprehensions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts