Pratik Ramchandra Patil vs State of Maharashtra by Cyber Police station Palghar — 35/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 23rd March 2026.

Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application

CNR: MHTH170003012026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-01-2026

Filing Number

283/2026

Filing Date

17-01-2026

Registration No

35/2026

Registration Date

17-01-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar

Judge

2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Pratik Ramchandra Patil

Adv. ADHIKARI TUKARAM YASHVANT

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra by Cyber Police station Palghar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR

23-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Reply/Say

13-03-2026

Reply/Say

05-03-2026

Reply/Say

25-02-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: The court partly allowed Pratik Ramchandra Patil's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to recover Rs. 27,000 that was fraudulently transferred from his ICIC Bank account and frozen in an Axis Bank account during a cyber crime investigation. The court found the applicant to be the legitimate owner of the seized amount, as no other claimant came forward, and directed the Cyber Police Station to return the funds to his account, subject to him executing a bond for Rs. 27,000 on Rs. 500 stamp paper and filing an undertaking to deposit the amount as directed by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court partly allowed Pratik Ramchandra Patil's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to recover Rs. 27,000 that was fraudulently transferred from his ICIC Bank account and frozen in an Axis Bank account during a cyber crime investigation. The court found the applicant to be the legitimate owner of the seized amount, as no other claimant came forward, and directed the Cyber Police Station to return the funds to his account, subject to him executing a bond for Rs. 27,000 on Rs. 500 stamp paper and filing an undertaking to deposit the amount as directed by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case