RPF Diva vs Mohamad Kalim Mohamad Nashir Siddhiqui Advocate - Shah Alam Ansari — 618/2020
Case under Railway Act, 1989 Section 143. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 23rd April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHTH110006892020
Filing Number
689/2020
Filing Date
10-09-2020
Registration No
618/2020
Registration Date
10-09-2020
Court
Railway Court Kalyan
Judge
1-J.M.F.C. Rly. Kalyan
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
338
Police Station
Diwa RPF
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RPF Diva
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Mohamad Kalim Mohamad Nashir Siddhiqui Advocate - Shah Alam Ansari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-J.M.F.C. Rly. Kalyan
Disposed
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
Evidence Before Charge
Evidence Before Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 13-03-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 28-01-2026 | Evidence Before Charge |
| 06-12-2025 | Evidence Before Charge |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused, Mohamad Kalim Mohamad Nashir Siddhiqui, under Indian Railway Act Section 143 for fraudulently selling railway e-tickets at an inflated price (₹250-300 instead of the actual fare) on January 27, 2020. The court sentenced him to one month imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹10,000, finding him guilty of cheating and misrepresenting himself as an authorized ticket vendor, and ordered confiscation of seized tickets and electronic devices used in the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused, Mohamad Kalim Mohamad Nashir Siddhiqui, under Indian Railway Act Section 143 for fraudulently selling railway e-tickets at an inflated price (₹250-300 instead of the actual fare) on January 27, 2020. The court sentenced him to one month imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹10,000, finding him guilty of cheating and misrepresenting himself as an authorized ticket vendor, and ordered confiscation of seized tickets and electronic devices used in the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts