Kalyan GRP vs Sachin Santosh Jadhav Advocate - Pawar — 800562/2015
Case under Bombay Police Act Section 124. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 08th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHTH110000312015
Filing Number
800854/2015
Filing Date
05-01-2015
Registration No
800562/2015
Registration Date
05-01-2015
Court
Railway Court Kalyan
Judge
1-J.M.F.C. Rly. Kalyan
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
NC 1524
Police Station
GRP Kalyan
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kalyan GRP
Respondent(s)
Sachin Santosh Jadhav Advocate - Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-J.M.F.C. Rly. Kalyan
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 800562/2015 - Kalyan GRP v. Sachin Santosh Jadhav Advocate Pawar The court acquitted the accused under IPC Section 124 (sedition charge) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove that the accused unlawfully obtained a Samsung mobile phone on 25 November 2014; the three witnesses provided contradictory testimonies regarding how the phone was recovered. The court found that the confessional statement lacked credibility and the evidence was circumstantial, making it impossible to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 800562/2015 - Kalyan GRP v. Sachin Santosh Jadhav Advocate Pawar The court acquitted the accused under IPC Section 124 (sedition charge) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove that the accused unlawfully obtained a Samsung mobile phone on 25 November 2014; the three witnesses provided contradictory testimonies regarding how the phone was recovered. The court found that the confessional statement lacked credibility and the evidence was circumstantial, making it impossible to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts