Yashawant Babu Bhoir vs Vasudev Waman Bhoir — 200/2016

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,31. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 13th September 2017.

Case disposed

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHTH070012062016

Filing Number

1168/2016

Filing Date

02-Jul-2016

Registration No

200/2016

Registration Date

07-Jul-2016

Court

Civil Court Senior Divison , Kalyan

Judge

5-2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge S.D. Kalyan

Decision Date

13-Sep-2017

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,31

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Yashawant Babu Bhoir

    Adv. B G Ahuja

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vasudev Waman Bhoir

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Sep-2017

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition under Order 9 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure due to the plaintiff's consistent absence and failure to prosecute the case since July 2016. The court found that the plaintiff's repeated non-appearance and lack of steps to secure the defendant's presence demonstrated a lack of genuine interest in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Sep-2017

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge S.D. Kalyan

  4. 30-Aug-2017

    Dismissal Order

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge S.D. Kalyan

  5. 07-Aug-2017

    Dismissal Order

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge S.D. Kalyan

  6. 24-Jul-2017

    Dismissal Order

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge S.D. Kalyan

  7. 07-Jun-2017

    Notice_Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge S.D. Kalyan

  8. 22-Mar-2017

    Notice_Unready

    3rd Joint Civil Judge S.D.Kalyan

  9. 27-Feb-2017

    Notice_Unready

    3rd Joint Civil Judge S.D.Kalyan

  10. 24-Jan-2017

    Notice_Unready

    3rd Joint Civil Judge S.D.Kalyan

  11. 02-Dec-2016

    Notice_Unready

    3rd Joint Civil Judge S.D.Kalyan

  12. 14-Oct-2016

    Notice_Unready

    3rd Joint Civil Judge S.D.Kalyan

  13. 02-Sep-2016

    Notice_Unready

  14. 29-Jul-2016

    Notice_Unready

  15. 24-Jul-2016

    Notice_Unready

  16. 17-Jul-2016

    Notice_Unready

  17. 07-Jul-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 02-Jul-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition under Order 9 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure due to the plaintiff's consistent absence and failure to prosecute the case since July 2016. The court found that the plaintiff's repeated non-appearance and lack of steps to secure the defendant's presence demonstrated a lack of genuine interest in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case