Suhas Pandurang Jagtap. vs Nil — 508/2025
Case under Right of Persons with Disabilities Act Section 14. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHTH010080522025
e-Filing Number
03-12-2025
Filing Number
4956/2025
Filing Date
17-12-2025
Registration No
508/2025
Registration Date
18-12-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Thane
Judge
4-Ad-hoc Dist. Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge Thane
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suhas Pandurang Jagtap.
Adv. PATIL JAYMALA SHAM
Respondent(s)
Nil
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Ad-hoc Dist. Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge Thane
Disposed
Order
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | Order |
| 13-03-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 04-02-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 19-12-2025 | Notice_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CMA No. 508/2025 The Thane District Court granted Suhas Pandurang Jagtap's guardianship application under Section 14 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The court appointed him as guardian of his 54-year-old sister, Miss Rekha Pandurang Jagtap, who suffers from schizophrenia with 45% permanent disability and is unemployable. Finding no adverse interests and confirming the applicant's fitness to manage her person and pension benefits, the court directed him to act for her welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CMA No. 508/2025 The Thane District Court granted Suhas Pandurang Jagtap's guardianship application under Section 14 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The court appointed him as guardian of his 54-year-old sister, Miss Rekha Pandurang Jagtap, who suffers from schizophrenia with 45% permanent disability and is unemployable. Finding no adverse interests and confirming the applicant's fitness to manage her person and pension benefits, the court directed him to act for her welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts