Hrushikesh Vivekand Maraplle vs Bhanudas Mahadu Alhat — 1048/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHTH010042762025
e-Filing Number
30-06-2025
Filing Number
1660/2025
Filing Date
02-Jul-2025
Registration No
1048/2025
Registration Date
02-Jul-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Thane
Judge
3-Member M.A.C.T. Thane
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Hrushikesh Vivekand Maraplle
Adv. MANE SACHIN LAKSHMAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bhanudas Mahadu Alhat
-
2.Reliance General Insurance Company Limited
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Lok Adalat at Thane disposed of the motor accident compensation case between Hrushikesh Vivekand Maraplle and Reliance General Insurance Company by approving a settlement. The insurance company agreed to pay Rs. 9,50,000 within one month via RTGS/NEFT to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal account, with 8% annual interest if delayed. Of this amount, Rs. 4,00,000 must be invested in a 3-year fixed deposit, with the remainder paid via cheque; court fees were refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Member M.A.C.T. Thane
-
13-Mar-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
Member M.A.C.T. Thane
-
07-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Member M.A.C.T. Thane
-
15-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
Member M.A.C.T. Thane
-
16-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1048/2025
Summary: The Lok Adalat at Thane disposed of the motor accident compensation case between Hrushikesh Vivekand Maraplle and Reliance General Insurance Company by approving a settlement. The insurance company agreed to pay Rs. 9,50,000 within one month via RTGS/NEFT to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal account, with 8% annual interest if delayed. Of this amount, Rs. 4,00,000 must be invested in a 3-year fixed deposit, with the remainder paid via cheque; court fees were refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts