Bhomaram Narsigaram Suthar vs Rohidas Satish Patare Advocate - A M PHADTARE — 740/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEMENT BY MEDIATION on 27th April 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHTH010030612025
e-Filing Number
01-05-2025
Filing Number
1190/2025
Filing Date
09-05-2025
Registration No
740/2025
Registration Date
09-05-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Thane
Judge
3-Member M.A.C.T. Thane
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLEMENT BY MEDIATION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhomaram Narsigaram Suthar
Adv. PANDEY PRAVEEN KUMAR SHIV SHANKAR
Respondent(s)
Rohidas Satish Patare Advocate - A M PHADTARE
TATA AIG General Insurance Co Ltd
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Member M.A.C.T. Thane
Disposed
Issues
Issues
Issues
No W.S. Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | Issues |
| 13-03-2026 | Issues |
| 02-02-2026 | Issues |
| 19-11-2025 | No W.S. Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Thane, disposed of the petition through mediated compromise, settling the claimant's dispute with TATA AIG General Insurance Co Ltd for Rs. 6,45,000. The vehicle owner (Opponent No.1) was exonerated from liability, and the insurance company must deposit the settlement amount within one month via RTGS/NEFT, with 8% annual interest if payment is delayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Thane, disposed of the petition through mediated compromise, settling the claimant's dispute with TATA AIG General Insurance Co Ltd for Rs. 6,45,000. The vehicle owner (Opponent No.1) was exonerated from liability, and the insurance company must deposit the settlement amount within one month via RTGS/NEFT, with 8% annual interest if payment is delayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts