Ganesh Shivaji Pingale vs Dilip Bhisamaji Patil — 719/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE on 08th April 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHTH010029842025
e-Filing Number
30-04-2025
Filing Number
1161/2025
Filing Date
07-05-2025
Registration No
719/2025
Registration Date
07-05-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Thane
Judge
3-Member M.A.C.T. Thane
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesh Shivaji Pingale
Adv. YADAV AJAY KUMAR
Respondent(s)
Dilip Bhisamaji Patil
TATA AIG Gen Insurance Co Ltd
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Member M.A.C.T. Thane
Disposed
Ex-Parte Order
Ex-Parte Order
Ex-Parte Order
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Order |
| 13-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Order |
| 07-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Order |
| 20-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Thane disposed of the petition through a settlement compromise between claimant Ganesh Shivaji Pingale and TATA AIG General Insurance Company (Opponent No.2) for Rs. 3,00,000. The vehicle owner (Opponent No.1) was exonerated from liability. The insurance company was directed to deposit the settlement amount within one month via RTGS/NEFT, with 8% interest p.a. if delayed, and the amount to be transferred to the claimant's bank account as specified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Thane disposed of the petition through a settlement compromise between claimant Ganesh Shivaji Pingale and TATA AIG General Insurance Company (Opponent No.2) for Rs. 3,00,000. The vehicle owner (Opponent No.1) was exonerated from liability. The insurance company was directed to deposit the settlement amount within one month via RTGS/NEFT, with 8% interest p.a. if delayed, and the amount to be transferred to the claimant's bank account as specified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts