Surekha Ramesh Gangar vs Dinesh Ukhajirao Patil — 676/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHTH010025602024
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
16-05-2024
Filing Number
1030/2024
Filing Date
16-05-2024
Registration No
676/2024
Registration Date
16-05-2024
Court
District and Session Court , Thane
Judge
5-Extra Jt. District Judge Addl. Sessions Judge as Member MACT, Thane
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Surekha Ramesh Gangar
Adv. Govind Mourya
Respondent(s)
Dinesh Ukhajirao Patil
Bajaj Allianz Gen Ins Co Ltd
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Extra Jt. District Judge Addl. Sessions Judge as Member MACT, Thane
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Written Statement
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-11-2025 | Written Statement |
| 06-10-2025 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Case 676/2024 Summary: Respondent No.2 (Bajaj Allianz Gen Ins Co Ltd) filed an application to set aside the "no Written Statement" order dated 18.02.2026 and to file its written statement. The court allowed the application, condoned the delay in filing the written statement, set aside the no W.S. order, and permitted respondent No.2's written statement to be taken on record. The petition will now proceed on merits with both parties having the opportunity to present their cases. No order as to costs was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 676/2024 Summary: Respondent No.2 (Bajaj Allianz Gen Ins Co Ltd) filed an application to set aside the "no Written Statement" order dated 18.02.2026 and to file its written statement. The court allowed the application, condoned the delay in filing the written statement, set aside the no W.S. order, and permitted respondent No.2's written statement to be taken on record. The petition will now proceed on merits with both parties having the opportunity to present their cases. No order as to costs was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts