Grishma Sharad Patole vs Chirag Kishor Nagda — 347/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHTH010014192025
e-Filing Number
25-02-2025
Filing Number
581/2025
Filing Date
27-02-2025
Registration No
347/2025
Registration Date
28-02-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Thane
Judge
3-Member M.A.C.T. Thane
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Grishma Sharad Patole
Adv. SINGH VRIJESH KESHAVE
Shruti Sharad Patole
Adv. SINGH VRIJESH KESHAVE
Vaishnavi Sharad Patole
Adv. SINGH VRIJESH KESHAVE
Uday Sharad Patole
Adv. SINGH VRIJESH KESHAVE
Vacchala Bai Madhukar Patole
Adv. SINGH VRIJESH KESHAVE
Respondent(s)
Chirag Kishor Nagda
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Member M.A.C.T. Thane
Disposed
Lok-Nyayalaya
Written Statement
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 21-02-2026 | Written Statement |
| 04-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 22-08-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Lok Adalat at Thane disposed of the dispute between Grishma Sharad Patole & Others and Acko General Insurance Company Ltd through settlement on 14/03/2026. The insurance company was directed to deposit Rs. 21,00,000 (Twenty-One Lakhs) within one month, with equal distribution among claimants; amounts for minor claimants (Nos. 2-4) to be invested in fixed deposits until majority, while claimants 1 and 5 receive compensation via RTGS/NEFT. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Lok Adalat at Thane disposed of the dispute between Grishma Sharad Patole & Others and Acko General Insurance Company Ltd through settlement on 14/03/2026. The insurance company was directed to deposit Rs. 21,00,000 (Twenty-One Lakhs) within one month, with equal distribution among claimants; amounts for minor claimants (Nos. 2-4) to be invested in fixed deposits until majority, while claimants 1 and 5 receive compensation via RTGS/NEFT. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts