SAJEED RAUF PAWLE vs State of Maharashtra Th, Diaghar Police Station — 357/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 20th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHTH010011762026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
734/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
357/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Thane
Judge
4-Ad-hoc Dist. Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge Thane
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
972
Police Station
Diaghar Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAJEED RAUF PAWLE
Adv. Nikhil Sakharam Gole
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Th, Diaghar Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Ad-hoc Dist. Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge Thane
Disposed
Order
Arguments
Arguments
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 357/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to Sajeed Rauf Pawle in a mob assault case. The applicant was accused of being part of an unlawful assembly in a December 2025 incident that resulted in grievous injuries, but crucially, the chargesheet has not yet been filed against him. The judge found that all co-accused have already been granted bail by the same court, parity considerations apply, the applicant's specific role was limited (assembly member with no allegation of instigating or carrying weapons), and the primary investigation is complete. He was released on Rs. 25,000 personal bond with conditions including cooperation with police, non-tampering of evidence, and jurisdiction restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 357/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to Sajeed Rauf Pawle in a mob assault case. The applicant was accused of being part of an unlawful assembly in a December 2025 incident that resulted in grievous injuries, but crucially, the chargesheet has not yet been filed against him. The judge found that all co-accused have already been granted bail by the same court, parity considerations apply, the applicant's specific role was limited (assembly member with no allegation of instigating or carrying weapons), and the primary investigation is complete. He was released on Rs. 25,000 personal bond with conditions including cooperation with police, non-tampering of evidence, and jurisdiction restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts