Shaikh Zainal Yusuf Ali vs State of Maharashtra Th Kashimira Police Station,Dist.Thane — 90/2026
Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Rules Section 8,12. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHTH010003092026
e-Filing Number
12-01-2026
Filing Number
180/2026
Filing Date
17-01-2026
Registration No
90/2026
Registration Date
17-01-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Thane
Judge
6-District Judge-4 Addl. Sessions Judge Thane
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
562
Police Station
Kashmira Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shaikh Zainal Yusuf Ali
Adv. S C Kanojia
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Th Kashimira Police Station,Dist.Thane
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge-4 Addl. Sessions Judge Thane
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 02-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 21-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted bail to Shaikh Zainal Yusuf Ali in a POCSO Act case involving allegations of luring a 7-year-old child. The judge found no prima facie offence under POCSO Act on the FIR allegations, noted the accused had no criminal record, completed investigation, and filed chargesheet—rendering further detention purposeless. Bail was granted on ₹15,000 personal recognizance bond with conditions prohibiting witness intimidation and requiring court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted bail to Shaikh Zainal Yusuf Ali in a POCSO Act case involving allegations of luring a 7-year-old child. The judge found no prima facie offence under POCSO Act on the FIR allegations, noted the accused had no criminal record, completed investigation, and filed chargesheet—rendering further detention purposeless. Bail was granted on ₹15,000 personal recognizance bond with conditions prohibiting witness intimidation and requiring court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts