Maharashtra State vs Abhijeet @ Aba Ramdas Godse Advocate - Dhaygude R. K. — 108/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(2)(N),363,392,323,506. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHST210002192024

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

02nd April 2026

Filing Number

109/2024

Filing Date

19-05-2016

Registration No

108/2024

Registration Date

19-05-2016

Court

District and Additional Sessions Court, Phaltan

Judge

1-District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 376(2)(N),363,392,323,506
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,5(L),6
Information Technology Act Section 66E,67B

Petitioner(s)

Maharashtra State

Adv. Lakade G.M.

Respondent(s)

Abhijeet @ Aba Ramdas Godse Advocate - Dhaygude R. K.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan

20-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

06-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

20-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

06-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

27-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

10-04-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In Special POCSO Case No. 108/2024, the court ordered that accused Abhijeet @ Aba Ramdas Godse be produced in person before the court during prosecution evidence recording, and directed the Superintendent of Central Prison, Kalamba to shift him to Central Prison, Satara to facilitate his physical presence in court. Both prison superintendents were also directed to monitor and report the accused's behavior fortnightly to the court, and witnesses were bonded over for further appearance on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Special POCSO Case No. 108/2024, the court ordered that accused Abhijeet @ Aba Ramdas Godse be produced in person before the court during prosecution evidence recording, and directed the Superintendent of Central Prison, Kalamba to shift him to Central Prison, Satara to facilitate his physical presence in court. Both prison superintendents were also directed to monitor and report the accused's behavior fortnightly to the court, and witnesses were bonded over for further appearance on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Additional Sessions Court, Phaltan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case