JAGANNATH BABURAO JADHAV vs The State of Maharashtra - Phaltan Rural Police Station Advocate - APP — 37/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHST210000872026
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
70/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
37/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Phaltan
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAGANNATH BABURAO JADHAV
Adv. Pawar Abhijeet S.
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra - Phaltan Rural Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Reply/Say
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 17-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 06-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 26-02-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 23-02-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Interim Orders
Summary: The ad-interim anticipatory bail application of Jagannath Baburao Jadhav (age 60) has been allowed. The accused was charged with offenses under Sections 351(2), 352, 119(1), and 3(5) of BNS for allegedly assaulting a complainant and snatching Rs. 7,300. The court determined that immediate custodial interrogation was unnecessary and granted bail on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions requiring him to attend police station for interrogation, not tamper with witnesses, and not leave India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The ad-interim anticipatory bail application of Jagannath Baburao Jadhav (age 60) has been allowed. The accused was charged with offenses under Sections 351(2), 352, 119(1), and 3(5) of BNS for allegedly assaulting a complainant and snatching Rs. 7,300. The court determined that immediate custodial interrogation was unnecessary and granted bail on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions requiring him to attend police station for interrogation, not tamper with witnesses, and not leave India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts