JAGANNATH BABURAO JADHAV vs The State of Maharashtra - Phaltan Rural Police Station Advocate - APP — 37/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHST210000872026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
70/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
37/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Phaltan
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAGANNATH BABURAO JADHAV
Adv. Pawar Abhijeet S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra - Phaltan Rural Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
08-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan
-
17-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan
-
06-Mar-2026
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan
-
26-Feb-2026
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan
-
23-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The ad-interim anticipatory bail application of Jagannath Baburao Jadhav (age 60) has been allowed. The accused was charged with offenses under Sections 351(2), 352, 119(1), and 3(5) of BNS for allegedly assaulting a complainant and snatching Rs. 7,300. The court determined that immediate custodial interrogation was unnecessary and granted bail on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions requiring him to attend police station for interrogation, not tamper with witnesses, and not leave India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 37/2026
Summary: The ad-interim anticipatory bail application of Jagannath Baburao Jadhav (age 60) has been allowed. The accused was charged with offenses under Sections 351(2), 352, 119(1), and 3(5) of BNS for allegedly assaulting a complainant and snatching Rs. 7,300. The court determined that immediate custodial interrogation was unnecessary and granted bail on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions requiring him to attend police station for interrogation, not tamper with witnesses, and not leave India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts