Aniket Vijay Padhare vs The State of Maharashtra - Phaltan Rural Police Station Advocate - APP — 36/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHST210000862026
e-Filing Number
20-02-2026
Filing Number
69/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
36/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Phaltan
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Aniket Vijay Padhare
Adv. Sadhana Nikam
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra - Phaltan Rural Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
04-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan
-
17-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan
-
06-Mar-2026
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan
-
26-Feb-2026
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan
-
25-Feb-2026
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan
-
21-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: Anticipatory bail granted to Aniket Vijay Padhare in a POCSO Act case (Crime No. 549/2025). The court found that while the accused was charged under BNS Sections 137(2), 64(1), 64(2)(m) and POCSO Sections 4, 6, 17, he played no vital role in the offense and investigation was complete with no pending recovery. He was released on personal bond (PB) and surety bond (SB) of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to conditions including not tampering with witnesses, not leaving India without court permission, and appearing before police as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2026
Summary: Anticipatory bail granted to Aniket Vijay Padhare in a POCSO Act case (Crime No. 549/2025). The court found that while the accused was charged under BNS Sections 137(2), 64(1), 64(2)(m) and POCSO Sections 4, 6, 17, he played no vital role in the offense and investigation was complete with no pending recovery. He was released on personal bond (PB) and surety bond (SB) of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to conditions including not tampering with witnesses, not leaving India without court permission, and appearing before police as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts