The State of Maharashtra - Phaltan Gramin Police Station vs Kunal Chandranant @ Bandu Madane Advocate - Pore J.V — 4/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,115(2),352,351(2),351(3),3(5). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHST210000312025
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
28/2025
Filing Date
10-01-2025
Registration No
4/2025
Registration Date
10-01-2025
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Phaltan
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra - Phaltan Gramin Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Kunal Chandranant @ Bandu Madane Advocate - Pore J.V
Sourabh Rajendra Londhe
Pandurang @ Panda Bapurao Masugade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and Addl Sessions Judge, Phaltan
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 06-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 20-02-2026 | Appearance |
| 06-02-2026 | Appearance |
| 02-02-2026 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The bail application of accused Kunal Chandrakant @ Bandu Madane and Saurabh Rajendra Londhe has been rejected. The court found sufficient evidence of their complicity in assaulting a 15-year-old victim with swords based on his caste, causing grievous injuries, with eyewitness corroboration and their criminal backgrounds. The court concluded that releasing them would risk witness intimidation and communal tension in their shared village. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The bail application of accused Kunal Chandrakant @ Bandu Madane and Saurabh Rajendra Londhe has been rejected. The court found sufficient evidence of their complicity in assaulting a 15-year-old victim with swords based on his caste, causing grievous injuries, with eyewitness corroboration and their criminal backgrounds. The court concluded that releasing them would risk witness intimidation and communal tension in their shared village. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts