Kisan Manaji Umbarkar vs The Collector, Satara — 607/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Injunction. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHST200029692020
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
Filing Number
1041/2023
Filing Date
20-12-2021
Registration No
607/2023
Registration Date
22-12-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Wai
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kisan Manaji Umbarkar
Adv. Badave A.Y.
Respondent(s)
The Collector, Satara
Officer of Jilha Parishad,
District Health Officer,
Head Officer Of Pachagani Giristhan, Nagarparishad
Health Officer Pachagani
Ishwarlal Manganlal
Madhusudan Ishwar Maganlal
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 20-01-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 18-11-2025 | Steps_Unready |
| 07-10-2025 | Steps_Unready |
| 26-08-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The plaintiff's application for restoration of the status-quo order in Special Civil Suit No. 607/2023 has been rejected. The court held that a previous status-quo order was already vacated by the learned predecessor judge upon the defendants' application, and therefore no grounds existed to restore it. The court found the plaintiff's cited authorities inapplicable and noted the plaintiff appeared more interested in prolonging the matter rather than proceeding with substantive arguments. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The plaintiff's application for restoration of the status-quo order in Special Civil Suit No. 607/2023 has been rejected. The court held that a previous status-quo order was already vacated by the learned predecessor judge upon the defendants' application, and therefore no grounds existed to restore it. The court found the plaintiff's cited authorities inapplicable and noted the plaintiff appeared more interested in prolonging the matter rather than proceeding with substantive arguments. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts