Kisan Manaji Umbarkar vs The Collector, Satara — 607/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Injunction. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHST200029692020

Steps_Unready

Next Hearing

24th April 2026

Filing Number

1041/2023

Filing Date

20-12-2021

Registration No

607/2023

Registration Date

22-12-2021

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Wai

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Injunction

Petitioner(s)

Kisan Manaji Umbarkar

Adv. Badave A.Y.

Respondent(s)

The Collector, Satara

Officer of Jilha Parishad,

District Health Officer,

Head Officer Of Pachagani Giristhan, Nagarparishad

Health Officer Pachagani

Ishwarlal Manganlal

Madhusudan Ishwar Maganlal

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai

06-03-2026

Steps_Unready

20-01-2026

Steps_Unready

18-11-2025

Steps_Unready

07-10-2025

Steps_Unready

26-08-2025

Steps_Unready

Interim Orders

22-07-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The plaintiff's application for restoration of the status-quo order in Special Civil Suit No. 607/2023 has been rejected. The court held that a previous status-quo order was already vacated by the learned predecessor judge upon the defendants' application, and therefore no grounds existed to restore it. The court found the plaintiff's cited authorities inapplicable and noted the plaintiff appeared more interested in prolonging the matter rather than proceeding with substantive arguments. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The plaintiff's application for restoration of the status-quo order in Special Civil Suit No. 607/2023 has been rejected. The court held that a previous status-quo order was already vacated by the learned predecessor judge upon the defendants' application, and therefore no grounds existed to restore it. The court found the plaintiff's cited authorities inapplicable and noted the plaintiff appeared more interested in prolonging the matter rather than proceeding with substantive arguments. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Wai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case