Sandip Vasant Khandagale vs Vasant Sahebrao Khandagale Advocate - Karande Ramesh V. — 606/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section (). Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 31st March 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHST200029672020
Next Hearing
31st March 2026
Filing Number
1040/2023
Filing Date
16-11-2021
Registration No
606/2023
Registration Date
01-12-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Wai
Judge
1-Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sandip Vasant Khandagale
Adv. Adkar D. C.
Respondent(s)
Vasant Sahebrao Khandagale Advocate - Karande Ramesh V.
Dipak Vasant Khandagle
Shital Mahendra Mahangare
Arjun Sahebrao Khandagle
Sachin Arjun Khandagle
Saurabh Arjun Khandagle
Supriya Machindra Gaikwad
Shobha Shamrao Jagtap
Anusaya @ Baydabai Jaysing Gadhave
Hirabai Namdeo Bhilare
Rajendra Namdeo Bhilare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 06-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 10-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 30-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 17-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The Court rejected the defendants' application seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on grounds of improper valuation. The Court held that Order VII Rule 11 applies only to cases of undervaluation or non-payment of court fees, not overvaluation, and overvaluation does not render a plaint defective. The Court directed that valuation objections be separately examined in the defendants' pending application under Section 8 of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act read with Section 11 of the Suit Valuation Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The Court rejected the defendants' application seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on grounds of improper valuation. The Court held that Order VII Rule 11 applies only to cases of undervaluation or non-payment of court fees, not overvaluation, and overvaluation does not render a plaint defective. The Court directed that valuation objections be separately examined in the defendants' pending application under Section 8 of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act read with Section 11 of the Suit Valuation Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts