Dharmesh Kishor Chheda vs Satpal Sitaram Malhotra Advocate - Chikane A. A. — 454/2023
Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHST200026032020
Filing Number
873/2023
Filing Date
11-Mar-2013
Registration No
454/2023
Registration Date
14-Mar-2013
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Wai
Judge
1-Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dharmesh Kishor Chheda
Adv. Wadikar N.M
-
2.Ekta Dharmesh Chheda
Respondent(s)
-
1.Satpal Sitaram Malhotra Advocate - Chikane A. A.
-
2.Baldev Sitaram Malhotra
-
3.Kumar Builders Thro. Lalitkumar Kesarimal Jain
-
4.Mukesh satpat malhotra
-
5.Ashvini satpat malhotra
-
6.Rajendramohini satpat malhotra
Case History
-
27-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Mar-2026
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
19-Dec-2025
EvidenceView PDF
Summary Special Civil Petition No. 454/2023 (Dharamesh v. Satpal) was dismissed by the Divisional Bench on December 19, 2025. The court found that the petitioner's affidavit contained deficiencies in supporting documentation and that certain statements lacked credibility, particularly regarding email evidence and prior knowledge of alleged property transactions. The cross-examination revealed contradictions in the petitioner's testimony concerning the existence and sale of disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
20-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
04-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
07-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
10-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
06-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
29-Nov-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
04-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
30-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
05-Jul-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
03-May-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
28-Mar-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
16-Feb-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
15-Dec-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
27-Oct-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
05-Sep-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
12-Jul-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
21-Jun-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
29-Mar-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
-
08-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2013
Case filed
Registration No. 454/2023
Summary Special Civil Petition No. 454/2023 (Dharamesh v. Satpal) was dismissed by the Divisional Bench on December 19, 2025. The court found that the petitioner's affidavit contained deficiencies in supporting documentation and that certain statements lacked credibility, particularly regarding email evidence and prior knowledge of alleged property transactions. The cross-examination revealed contradictions in the petitioner's testimony concerning the existence and sale of disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts