Chandrakant Dhondiba Dhebe vs state of Maharashtra thro collector Advocate - Katkar G.C — 204/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Declaration. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHST200018232020
Next Hearing
28th March 2026
Filing Number
595/2023
Filing Date
17-06-2014
Registration No
204/2023
Registration Date
18-06-2014
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Wai
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chandrakant Dhondiba Dhebe
Adv. Jadhav D.S
Sanjay Zilu Dhebe
Chandrakant Ramchandra Doiphode
Vitthal Dhondiba Dhebe
Shankar Dagadu Dhebe
Respondent(s)
state of Maharashtra thro collector Advocate - Katkar G.C
Assistant Forest security
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Wai
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Arguments
Arguments
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 06-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Property dispute concerning ownership rights and possession of forest land in Satara district Outcome: The petition (Application No. 57 in Civil Suit No. 204/2023) is GRANTED. The court issued an interim order restraining the defendant from demolishing the petitioner's house, shed, and livestock structures on the disputed property pending final judgment. Both parties are directed to complete final arguments on a date to be fixed, with no adjournment permitted given the 11-year pendency of the case. No order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Property dispute concerning ownership rights and possession of forest land in Satara district Outcome: The petition (Application No. 57 in Civil Suit No. 204/2023) is GRANTED. The court issued an interim order restraining the defendant from demolishing the petitioner's house, shed, and livestock structures on the disputed property pending final judgment. Both parties are directed to complete final arguments on a date to be fixed, with no adjournment permitted given the 11-year pendency of the case. No order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts