Prabhu Hiralal Jethani vs Gorakhnath Krishna Shinde — 224/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section (). Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHST200013992020
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
444/2023
Filing Date
11-01-2016
Registration No
224/2023
Registration Date
28-01-2016
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Wai
Judge
1-Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prabhu Hiralal Jethani
Adv. Yadav R.R
Javahar Hiralal Jethani
Adv. Khot A.S
Respondent(s)
Gorakhnath Krishna Shinde
Yogesh Gorakhnath Shinde
Evangilical Aliance Ministries
Adv. Khot A.S
Dilip Naik
Adv. Khot A.S
Madhu Suravade
Adv. Khot A.S
Vinayak Gavaji Gavit
Kamalakar Yousuf Thingale
Vasant Naik
Adv. Khot A.S
Vijay Dinakar Khisty
Rajendra Vijay Khisty
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wai
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Spl.C.S. No.224/2023 (Prabhu Vs. Gorakhnath), the Wai Civil Court allowed the application filed by Defendants 1A and 1B seeking to set aside the "No Written Statement" order and granted permission to file/adopt the written statement of Defendant No.1. The court found that while there was a 9-month delay, the defendants demonstrated sufficient cause due to unavailability of necessary documents and rival circumstances, and ruled that allowing the application would cause no prejudice to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Spl.C.S. No.224/2023 (Prabhu Vs. Gorakhnath), the Wai Civil Court allowed the application filed by Defendants 1A and 1B seeking to set aside the "No Written Statement" order and granted permission to file/adopt the written statement of Defendant No.1. The court found that while there was a 9-month delay, the defendants demonstrated sufficient cause due to unavailability of necessary documents and rival circumstances, and ruled that allowing the application would cause no prejudice to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts